The main Aveyo solar lawsuit on the public record is a 2025 federal case in Utah involving Aveyo Direct, LLC as a defendant. It was filed in April, removed to federal court as a securities matter, and dismissed without prejudice in June after the parties jointly stipulated to end it. Separate from that case, the Utah-based residential solar company has drawn a steady stream of consumer complaints alleging installation delays, poor communication, and undelivered equipment.
The Federal Case in Utah
The suit, Wolves Ventures, LLC et al v. Soar Energy, Inc. et al, was filed in Utah’s Business and Chancery Court in April 2025 and then removed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, where it was docketed as 2:25-cv-00339 before District Judge Ann Marie McIff Allen. Aveyo Direct, LLC was among the named defendants and was represented by Chad S. Pehrson and Alexis V. Nelson of Kunzler Bean & Adamson. The removal notice cited the Securities Exchange Act, and the case was classified in federal court records as a securities matter.1PACER Monitor. Wolves Ventures, LLC et al v. Soar Energy, Inc. et al
The court never ruled on the merits. On June 18, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation to dismiss. Two days later, on June 20, 2025, the court terminated the case. The dismissal was without prejudice, so the claims could in theory be refiled, and each side agreed to bear its own costs and fees.1PACER Monitor. Wolves Ventures, LLC et al v. Soar Energy, Inc. et al
The precise nature of Aveyo’s relationship to the co-defendant, Soar Energy, Inc., and the terms of whatever resolution led to the dismissal have not been publicly disclosed. Soar Energy is a separate California-based solar company founded in 2022.2PR Newswire. Nations Fastest Growing Solar Company Soar Energy Partners With Better Earth to Disrupt Real Estate Sustainability Sector
Consumer Complaints Against Aveyo
The federal case is not the only source of legal and consumer scrutiny. Reviews across platforms describe a recurring pattern: long gaps between contract signing and a working system, sparse communication, and installations left incomplete.
One customer posting in January 2025 said they had waited more than 12 months after signing and funding a contract without a functional system, followed up over 20 times, and encountered “almost zero communication.” The same reviewer reported missing panel covers, holes left in walls from electrical work, and missing monitoring equipment. Another customer said site survey appointments were scheduled three times, and the surveyor failed to appear twice.3EnergySage. Aveyo
Other complaints go further. One customer reported that a roof leak caused by the installation led to ceiling damage and said the company declined to address repair requests for months. Several reviewers said promised equipment, including backup batteries or generators, was never delivered. Financial complaints include lending arrangements that reviewers say restrict loan transfers when a homeowner sells, and a $750 fee tied to transfers. An October 2025 reviewer alleged that Aveyo was unfamiliar with local regulations and failed to submit required permitting documents, delaying the project by two to three months. As of late 2025, Aveyo held a B+ rating with the Better Business Bureau.4Resident Solar Power. Aveyo Review
About the Company
Aveyo was formed in early 2023 through the consolidation of 13 smaller solar firms and handles the full project lifecycle, from sales and CAD design through installation and activation.5Aveyo. The Merger6Aveyo. About Aveyo Founder Jeremy Hammond led the company initially. In December 2025, Aveyo announced that Dave Anderson, its CFO for the prior two years, would step into the CEO role, while Hammond moved to lead Caliber, described as a sister brand.7Aveyo. A New CEO