Carnival Triumph Lawsuit: Verdicts, Settlements, and BAE Suit

The Carnival Triumph lawsuit is the consolidated litigation that followed a February 2013 engine room fire that stranded more than 4,200 passengers and crew in the Gulf of Mexico for five days without power, working toilets, or adequate food. Thousands of claims were consolidated in Miami federal court as MDL No. 2481, where Senior U.S. District Judge Donald Graham found Carnival negligent but sharply limited what passengers could recover. Most claims ended in confidential individual settlements estimated between $5,000 and $50,000, and a small bench trial produced a total award of just $118,500 across the remaining plaintiffs.¹²

What Passengers Sued Over

On February 10, 2013, a fuel oil return line on the ship’s No. 6 diesel generator failed and sprayed fuel that ignited near the turbocharger. The fire knocked out the main electrical supply and both propulsion motors, leaving the Triumph adrift off the coast of Mexico while headed back to Galveston, Texas.³

Over the following five days, toilets overflowed and passengers reported bags of human waste piling up in hallways. Air conditioning, lighting, and running water were largely gone. Cabins grew so hot that many passengers slept on deck in makeshift tent camps, and food was rationed. The Bahamas Maritime Authority investigation later confirmed sewage in open bins around the vessel, food shortages, hoarding, and long queues.⁴³ The ship was towed to Mobile, Alabama, arriving the evening of February 14, and passengers disembarked the next morning.⁵

Plaintiffs reported post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, kidney stones, upper respiratory problems, diarrhea, and other conditions they attributed to the ship’s unsanitary environment.⁶

Prior Warnings

The investigation revealed that the Triumph had a documented history of problems with the equipment that caused the fire. A fire had already occurred at diesel generator No. 6 just one month earlier, in January 2013, and investigators flagged a recurring history of fuel oil return pipe failures on that same generator.³ CNN reported that the ship had set sail with only four of its six generators fully operational.⁴

Houston attorney Frank Spagnoletti, who represented dozens of passengers, pointed to a January 2 compliance notice regarding fuel leaks and criticized Carnival for giving the ship a two-month deadline to fix the issue while continuing to sail with passengers aboard, describing the situation as “basically Russian roulette.”⁷ He also said the cruise line had experienced nine incidents involving faulty fuel lines in the two years before the Triumph fire.⁸

How the Litigation Was Structured

The first case was filed almost immediately. Cassie Terry, a 25-year-old from Brazoria County, Texas, sued Carnival in Miami federal court on February 15, 2013, alleging breach of maritime contract, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud.⁹ A proposed class action followed days later.¹⁰ Thousands of claims were eventually consolidated as MDL No. 2481, In re Carnival Triumph Cruise Ship Incident Litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.¹

Passengers pursued several legal theories: negligence in vessel maintenance and crew training, breach of contract for failing to provide the promised voyage, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and violations of general maritime law.¹

Carnival’s Ticket Contract Defense

Carnival’s strategy leaned heavily on the fine print in its passenger ticket. Company attorneys argued that the ticket “makes absolutely no guarantee for safe passage, a seaworthy vessel, adequate and wholesome food, and sanitary and safe living conditions.”¹¹ Carnival said its only obligation was to exercise “reasonable care under the circumstances” and characterized the suits as “an opportunistic attempt to benefit financially by seeking additional money from the company principally based on claims of alleged emotional distress.”¹² The company also argued that passengers could not prove their medical issues were caused by conditions on the ship, and that many plaintiffs had never sought medical treatment.¹³

After the litigation, Carnival quietly amended its terms and conditions to remove the specific language disclaiming guarantees of wholesome food, sanitary conditions, and safe passage.¹⁴

Why Recoveries Were Limited

The case was assigned to Senior U.S. District Judge Donald Graham, whose pretrial rulings shaped the outcome more than the trial itself. He found Carnival negligent simply because the fire occurred, applying res ipsa loquitur and reasoning that ships should not catch fire in the middle of the sea for no reason.¹⁵¹³

But he also gutted the damages case. Judge Graham ruled that Carnival was not liable for breach of contract, finding the ticket did not guarantee safe passage or sanitary conditions. He struck all claims for punitive damages, finding no evidence of intentional misconduct. And he barred recovery for emotional injuries not accompanied by physical injuries. Passengers could only collect for past and future medical costs “conclusively linked to what happened on the Triumph.”¹⁶⁶

What Passengers Actually Received

The Bench Trial

A bench trial proceeded for a group of 33 passengers, later reduced when Judge Graham dismissed six plaintiffs. Spagnoletti argued that individual compensation should range from $30,000 to $1 million depending on the severity of injuries. Carnival’s defense counsel, Curtis Mase, countered that most plaintiffs deserved less than $50,000 and some nothing at all.¹³

The trial ended with a total award of $118,500. Three passengers received $15,000 each. The other 24 who obtained any compensation received amounts averaging less than $3,000. The six dismissed plaintiffs faced motions from Carnival to recover its legal costs.² Those already-modest awards were further reduced by attorney fees, legal costs, and passengers’ travel and lodging expenses for the Miami trial.

Carnival’s Initial Offer

Before litigation played out, Carnival had offered every Triumph passenger a compensation package: a full refund for the cruise, a future cruise credit of equal value, $500 cash per person, a free flight home, and a refund for most onboard expenses.¹⁷ Maritime law expert Jim Walker said at the time that the offer was “probably more than Triumph passengers would likely win in court.”¹⁸ The trial verdicts largely bore that prediction out.

Individual Settlements

Rather than let a class action reach certification and a public verdict, Carnival negotiated private, confidential settlements with individual passengers and their attorneys. Most were finalized between 2013 and 2016. The company never disclosed a total payout figure. Passengers who hired counsel and pursued individual claims generally received estimated settlements between $5,000 and $50,000, with the higher amounts going to those who could document physical illness, psychological harm, or significant exposure to unsanitary conditions.¹ No punitive damage awards were publicly confirmed.

Carnival’s Separate Suit Against BAE Systems

The passenger cases were not the only litigation to come out of the incident. After the fire, the powerless Triumph was towed to a BAE Systems shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, for repairs. On April 3, 2013, during a rainstorm, the ship broke free from its moorings when multiple bollards failed, striking other structures and vessels. An NTSB investigation found the probable cause was the successive failure of mooring bollards that BAE Systems knew were in poor condition, based on a June 2010 engineering report rating the pier’s hardware as “serious” and the overall condition as “poor.” BAE had not disclosed the pier’s condition to Carnival personnel.⁵

Carnival filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama in June 2013, seeking more than $12.6 million in damages from BAE and several other defendants, alleging that BAE breached its repair contract by providing a berth with deteriorated and defective mooring equipment.¹⁹ The case settled on March 30, 2016. Financial terms were not disclosed.²⁰

1
LawFold. Poop Cruise Lawsuit Settlement
2
Cruise Law News. As Predicted, Poop Cruise Lawsuit Poops Out
3
Bahamas Maritime Authority. BMA Investigation Report: Fire Onboard the Carnival Triumph
4
CNN. Carnival Cruise Triumph Problems
5
NTSB. Marine Accident Brief MAB-14/02
6
CBC News. Carnival Passengers Seeking Compensation Over Disabled Ship
7
CBS News. Suit: Fire Risk Known Before Carnival’s Triumph Sailed
8
OnMilwaukee. Poop Cruise Netflix
9
ABC News. Carnival Cruise Ship Hit With Lawsuit Over Floating Hell
10
Courthouse News Service. First Class Action Filed for the Carnival Cruise to Hell
11
Travelers United. Did Carnival Really Say Your Ticket Doesn’t Guarantee a Safe, Sanitary Cruise?
12
CLICK2Houston. Cruise Ship Passengers Sue Carnival Cruise Line
13
CNN. Carnival Triumph Cruise Trial
14
Yahoo News UK. Carnival Triumph’s Terrifying Ticket Clause
15
NBC DFW. Carnival Passengers in Court Over Disabled Ship
16
Aronfeld Trial Lawyers. Carnival Cruise Line Triumph Lawsuit
17
Lipcon, Margulies & Winkleman. How Much Will Carnival Triumph Passengers Be Compensated
18
gCaptain Forum. Triumph Passengers Bring Class Action Against Carnival
19
Marine Log. Carnival Files Suit Against BAE Systems
20
Law360. Carnival Corporation v. BAE Systems SSY Alabama Property Holdings