Enviva Class Action Lawsuit: Fanucchi and Davis v. Keppler Cases

The Enviva class action lawsuit is actually two separate securities fraud cases filed in the District of Maryland: Fanucchi v. Enviva Inc., which alleged the company greenwashed its wood pellet sourcing, and Davis v. Keppler (originally Dhatt v. Enviva Inc.), which alleged executives hid deteriorating finances before a May 2023 earnings collapse. The first case was dismissed in July 2024. The second is partially alive against two former executives. Neither is likely to produce a recovery for former shareholders, because Enviva’s March 2024 Chapter 11 bankruptcy cancelled existing stock and gave the reorganized company’s equity to creditors.

The Two Cases at a Glance

Both suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland and both allege violations of federal securities laws, but they cover different time periods and different alleged misconduct.

Fanucchi v. Enviva Inc., No. 8:22-cv-02844-DKC, was filed November 3, 2022. The class period ran from February 21, 2019, through October 11, 2022. It named Enviva, six officers, and eleven underwriter defendants, and brought claims under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the 1934 Exchange Act and Sections 11 and 15 of the 1933 Securities Act.1Climate Policy Radar. Fanucchi v. Enviva Inc.

Davis v. Keppler, No. 8:23-cv-02474, was filed September 13, 2023, covering a class period from November 3, 2022, through May 3, 2023. It named five former executives, including three successive CEOs, the CFO, and the chief accounting officer.2Bloomberg Law. Two Enviva Ex-Executives Fail to Shake Securities Fraud Claims

Fanucchi: The Greenwashing Case That Was Dismissed

The Fanucchi complaint alleged Enviva systematically misrepresented how it sourced wood and the climate impact of its pellets. Publicly, Enviva said its pellets came exclusively from low-value byproducts like sawmill residuals, tops, and brush, and that it “does not take sawtimber.”3Squarespace. Enviva Amended Complaint

Plaintiffs, citing whistleblowers and former employees, alleged Enviva actually relied on “100% whole trees,” engaged in clear-cutting, and took 70% to 100% of the wood from harvested areas rather than the under-30% average it publicly claimed.3Squarespace. Enviva Amended Complaint They also alleged that burning wood pellets produced more greenhouse gas emissions than burning coal, contradicting Enviva’s marketing.4Climate Case Chart. Fanucchi v. Enviva Inc.

The complaint pointed to three events as corrective disclosures that each drove the stock down: an October 12, 2022 Blue Orca Capital short-seller report accusing Enviva of “flagrantly greenwashing” its wood procurement; a December 5, 2022 Mongabay investigation citing whistleblowers on whole-tree use; and a December 15, 2022 Dutch parliamentary vote to end subsidies to Enviva over its green credentials.5D&O Diary. Enviva Class Action Complaint

The case did not survive. After Enviva filed for Chapter 11 on March 12, 2024, the court administratively closed the action against the company itself under the automatic bankruptcy stay.6Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. Enviva Inc. Securities Litigation On July 3, 2024, the court dismissed the remaining claims against the individual officers and underwriters, finding plaintiffs had not sufficiently alleged material misrepresentations or scienter (intentional or reckless deception).4Climate Case Chart. Fanucchi v. Enviva Inc.

Davis v. Keppler: The Financial Concealment Case Still Alive in Part

The second case is narrower in focus and, so far, more successful. It centers on what executives told investors in the months leading up to Enviva’s May 3, 2023 earnings report.

Plaintiffs allege Thomas Meth, who became CEO in November 2022, repeatedly expressed “strong conviction” in the company’s ability to deliver hundreds of millions in adjusted EBITDA and said growth was “underwritten by our existing contracted backlog.” CFO Shai Even similarly told investors to expect “very strong cash flow from operating activities in 2023.”7Wolf Popper LLP. Dhatt v. Enviva Inc. Complaint

On May 3, 2023, Enviva reported a first-quarter loss of $117 million (nearly triple analyst expectations), eliminated its $0.905 per share quarterly dividend, and revised its projected 2023 net loss from a range of $18–$48 million to $136–$186 million.8Mongabay. Financial Downturn at Enviva Could Mean Trouble for Biomass Energy The next day the stock fell 67.2% in a single session, closing at $7.01 on volume more than 28 times the daily average.9Wolf Popper LLP. Shareholder Alert: Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Enviva Inc. The stock had traded near $85 in April 2022 and was below $9 by mid-May 2023, an approximately 90% decline.

What Survived the Motion to Dismiss

On December 29, 2025, Judge Matthew J. Maddox granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The court found plaintiffs adequately alleged scienter as to three sets of statements by Meth and Even:10GovInfo. Davis v. Keppler, Civ. No. MJM-23-2474

  • Meth’s description on a March 2023 earnings call of a Q4 2022 purchase agreement with RWE as “attractive,” while allegedly omitting that it exposed Enviva to hundreds of millions in losses.
  • Meth’s statements about manufacturing and production challenges at Enviva’s Southampton facility, made on the March 2023 earnings call and at an April 2023 Investor Day.
  • A Form 10-Q for Q1 2023 signed by Meth and Even stating that the Q4 2022 purchase agreements were priced “at market prices in effect at the time of the agreements.”

The judge dismissed other allegations as forward-looking projections covered by safe-harbor provisions, non-actionable puffery, or statements where plaintiffs had not shown defendants knew they were false when made.2Bloomberg Law. Two Enviva Ex-Executives Fail to Shake Securities Fraud Claims Claims against former CEO John Keppler and former Chief Accounting Officer Michael Johnson did not survive.

As of early 2026, the surviving claims against Meth and Even remain pending. There is no publicly reported trial date and no reported settlement.

What This Means for Former EVA Shareholders

If you held Enviva common stock, the bankruptcy is the fact that governs your outcome, not the pending litigation. Enviva Inc. and certain subsidiaries filed Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on March 12, 2024 (Case No. 24-10453-BFK).11GovInfo. Enviva Inc. Chapter 11 Petition The bankruptcy court confirmed a reorganization plan on November 13, 2024, and Enviva emerged from Chapter 11 on December 9, 2024.12Davis Polk. Enviva Emerges From Chapter 11

The reorganization eliminated roughly $1 billion in debt. Creditors received substantially all of the reorganized company’s equity. Existing shareholder interests were cancelled with no recovery expected.13Biomass Magazine. Enviva Files Amended Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan The company emerged as a private entity, no longer listed on any exchange and no longer filing with the SEC.14Investing.com. Enviva Outlines Amended Reorganization Plan

The surviving claims in Davis v. Keppler run against two individuals, Thomas Meth and Shai Even, not against the reorganized company. Any eventual recovery in that case would depend on those individuals or applicable insurance, not on the value of Enviva itself.

The Separate SEC Complaint

One development sometimes confused with the class actions is a September 23, 2024 complaint filed with the SEC by the Southern Environmental Law Center. It urged the agency to investigate Enviva’s statements about climate impact and sourcing, alleging Enviva omitted smokestack emissions data from public disclosures and misrepresented its feedstock. This is not a class action, and it does not create any claim for private investors. As of mid-2026 there is no public record of the SEC opening a formal investigation or taking enforcement action in response.15SELC. World’s Largest Wood Pellet Company Accused of Greenwashing in New SEC Complaint