Kyle Rittenhouse Case Summary: Charges, Self-Defense, and Verdict

The Kyle Rittenhouse case ended on November 19, 2021, when a Kenosha County jury acquitted the then-18-year-old on all five remaining counts, including two homicide charges, after accepting his claim that he shot three men in self-defense during civil unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, on August 25, 2020. Two of the men, Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber, died; the third, Gaige Grosskreutz, survived a gunshot wound to the arm. Rittenhouse was 17 at the time of the shootings.

What Happened on August 25, 2020

Rittenhouse, who lived in Antioch, Illinois, traveled roughly 20 miles north to Kenosha carrying an AR-15-style rifle and a medical kit. He later said he went to protect a local business and help the injured.¹ Because he was under 18, he could not buy the rifle himself. A friend, Dominick Black, purchased it for him with money Rittenhouse provided.²

The first shooting happened at a used-car lot. Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, chased Rittenhouse and threw a plastic bag at him. Rittenhouse testified that Rosenbaum reached for the rifle. He fired four shots and killed him.³

Rittenhouse then ran toward a police line. Protesters who believed he was an active shooter pursued him. Anthony Huber, 26, caught up, struck him with a skateboard, and grabbed the barrel of the rifle. Rittenhouse fired one shot and killed him.³

Gaige Grosskreutz, 28, was in the same group. He was a volunteer medic and was armed with a pistol. Rittenhouse shot him once in the arm, destroying roughly 90 percent of his right bicep. On the witness stand, Grosskreutz acknowledged his pistol was pointed at Rittenhouse at the moment he was shot.³

After the shootings, Rittenhouse walked toward police with his hands raised. He was not detained at the scene and was taken into custody later in Lake County, Illinois.¹

Why Kenosha Was in Turmoil

Two days before Rittenhouse arrived, Kenosha police officer Rusten Sheskey shot Jacob Blake, a 29-year-old Black man, in the back at least seven times during a domestic-disturbance call. Blake survived and was left paralyzed.⁴ Protests followed, some turning to arson and property destruction. Governor Tony Evers eventually deployed 250 National Guard troops, and the county imposed nightly curfews. Sheskey was never charged. Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley declined to prosecute in January 2021, and the U.S. Department of Justice closed its civil rights inquiry in October 2021.⁵

Armed civilians began patrolling Kenosha’s streets at night. Social media calls circulated in advance, and Facebook later removed a page for a group called “The Kenosha Guard” for violating its policies against militia organizations.⁴

The Charges

Kenosha County prosecutors filed seven charges:

First-degree intentional homicide, for the killing of Anthony Huber
First-degree reckless homicide, for the killing of Joseph Rosenbaum
Attempted first-degree intentional homicide, for the shooting of Gaige Grosskreutz
Two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering safety
Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18 (misdemeanor)
Failure to comply with an emergency order (curfew violation)

Every felony carried a “use of a dangerous weapon” enhancer.⁶

The Two Charges Dismissed Before the Jury

The curfew count was dismissed on November 9, 2021. Prosecutors had not entered a lawful curfew order for August 25 into evidence, and the defense won the motion on that basis.⁷

The weapons possession charge was dismissed on November 12, 2021, on the strength of an exception in Wisconsin law. Wisconsin statute 948.60 generally bars minors from possessing dangerous weapons, but subsection (3)(c) applies the ban to rifles or shotguns only when the weapon is a short-barreled rifle under section 941.28 or the minor is out of compliance with hunting-certification requirements.⁸ Rittenhouse’s rifle was not short-barreled. Prosecutors conceded the point, and Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed the count.⁹ The ruling mattered beyond the misdemeanor itself. If carrying the rifle had been unlawful, prosecutors could have argued it was the kind of unlawful provocation that forfeits a self-defense claim under Wisconsin law.¹⁰

How the Trial Was Argued

The trial ran roughly two weeks at the Kenosha County Courthouse before Judge Schroeder, Wisconsin’s longest-serving circuit judge. Dozens of witnesses testified, and jurors saw extensive video and photo evidence.¹¹

Lead prosecutor Thomas Binger cast Rittenhouse as the aggressor who brought a rifle into a volatile scene and escalated confrontations. A central prosecution theory was that Rittenhouse had pointed his rifle at people before Rosenbaum chased him. If proven, that would qualify as provocation under Wisconsin law and could defeat self-defense. The prosecution leaned on drone footage to make the point, but the footage was distant, and legal observers said it was hard to make out exact actions.¹²

The defense worked, moment by moment, to put jurors inside Rittenhouse’s head at each encounter. Reporter Richard McGinnis testified that Rosenbaum chased Rittenhouse and reached for the rifle. Ryan Balch, another armed civilian on the streets that night, described Rosenbaum as “hyperaggressive.” Grosskreutz, called by the prosecution, conceded on cross-examination that he had pointed his pistol at Rittenhouse and had not disclosed in his initial statement to police that he was armed.¹³

Rittenhouse himself took the stand on November 10, 2021. He testified he feared for his life in each encounter: Rosenbaum reached for his weapon, Huber struck him and grabbed the rifle, and Grosskreutz pointed a pistol at his head.¹³

Midway through, the defense moved for a mistrial with prejudice, citing two incidents involving Binger: questioning Rittenhouse about his post-arrest silence, which Judge Schroeder called “a grave constitutional violation,” and referencing evidence Schroeder had ruled inadmissible.¹⁴ A second mistrial motion followed over the quality of drone footage turned over to the defense.¹⁵ Schroeder took both motions under advisement, saying he would address them only if the jury returned a guilty verdict. The acquittal made them moot.¹⁶

Schroeder himself became a subject of controversy. Before trial he ruled that prosecutors could not refer to the men Rittenhouse shot as “victims,” calling the term “loaded,” while allowing the defense to describe them as “rioters,” “looters,” or “arsonists” if evidence supported it. He also barred prosecution evidence about Rittenhouse’s alleged association with the Proud Boys and a prior video in which Rittenhouse discussed shooting suspected looters.¹⁴ Retired federal judge Nancy Gertner of Harvard Law School said Schroeder “put his finger on the scale.” Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske described him as an “old-school” judge who applied his standards consistently.¹⁷

The Self-Defense Law That Decided It

Wisconsin law allows a person to use deadly force if they reasonably believe they face imminent death or great bodily harm. Once a defendant raises self-defense, the burden shifts to the prosecution to disprove it beyond a reasonable doubt.¹²

Provocation can defeat that defense, but Wisconsin recognizes an exception: even a defendant who provoked an attack may still claim self-defense if they face imminent death and reasonably believe no other escape is available.¹⁰ Legal analysts writing after the verdict described the defense strategy as disciplined, returning again and again to what Rittenhouse perceived at each moment.¹²

The Harvard Law Review later noted that the “he was going for my gun” argument converts an otherwise nonlethal physical struggle into a perceived deadly threat, giving armed defendants broader legal room to use lethal force. The same argument surfaced in the George Zimmerman prosecution and the trial of the men who killed Ahmaud Arbery.¹⁸

The Verdict

The jury deliberated roughly 26 to 27 hours over four days. On November 19, 2021, it acquitted Rittenhouse on all five remaining felony counts. As each not-guilty verdict was read, Rittenhouse trembled and then collapsed in sobs. Hannah Gittings, Anthony Huber’s girlfriend, called the system “a failure.” Rosenbaum’s fiancée said she felt “the victims’ lives don’t matter.”¹⁹

Reaction split along familiar lines. Former President Donald Trump praised the verdict; President Joe Biden said he was “frustrated” and acknowledged many Americans would be “angry and concerned.” Representative Jerry Nadler called for a Department of Justice review.²⁰ Civil rights attorney Benjamin Crump, who represents the Blake family, called Rittenhouse “a racist, homicidal vigilante” and said the case showed “two justice systems at work in America.”²¹

What Followed the Criminal Case

Civil litigation continued after the acquittal. In August 2021, John Huber, Anthony Huber’s father, filed a federal wrongful-death and civil rights suit naming Rittenhouse, city officials, and police officers, alleging law enforcement conspired with armed civilians. In February 2023, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman denied motions to dismiss, ruling that Huber’s death “could plausibly be regarded as having been proximately caused by the actions of the governmental defendants.” Adelman also rejected Rittenhouse’s procedural challenge, saying he had been “deliberately cagey” about his address to avoid being served.²²

Gaige Grosskreutz filed his own federal civil rights suit against Kenosha city and county in October 2021, alleging police allowed armed patrols to operate “unchecked.” His filing included a $10 million claim notice.²³

Dominick Black, who bought the rifle, was initially charged with two felony counts of intentionally giving a dangerous weapon to a person under 18, causing death.² On January 10, 2022, he pleaded no contest to a non-criminal county ordinance citation for contributing to the delinquency of a minor and paid a $2,000 fine. The felonies were dismissed; prosecutors cited his early cooperation and truthful trial testimony.²⁴

On January 28, 2022, Judge Schroeder approved an agreement to destroy the rifle. Rittenhouse’s attorney, Mark Richards, said Rittenhouse wanted to ensure the weapon could not be used as a political symbol or trophy. The state crime lab was tasked with destroying the firearm, magazine, and scope.²⁵

1
NBC Chicago. Shootings, Arrest, Trial and More: The Kyle Rittenhouse Story Explained
2
CNN. Dominick Black, Who Bought Kyle Rittenhouse Gun, Reaches Plea Deal
3
NPR. What We Know About the 3 Men Kyle Rittenhouse Shot
4
NBC Chicago. Timeline: The Jacob Blake Shooting and the Unrest That Followed
5
NBC News. Officer Who Shot Jacob Blake Won’t Face Federal Civil Rights Charges
6
PBS NewsHour. What Charges Does Kyle Rittenhouse Face
7
Lake & McHenry County Scanner. Judge Dismisses Curfew Charge Against Kyle Rittenhouse as Prosecution Rests Their Case
8
Wisconsin State Legislature. Wisconsin Statutes Section 948.60
9
The Trace. Judge Dismisses Gun Charge Against Rittenhouse
10
Stanford Law School. Stanford Criminal Law Experts on the Kyle Rittenhouse Aquittal
11
New York Times. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Takeaways
12
NPR. Why Legal Experts Were Not Surprised by the Rittenhouse Jury’s Decision to Acquit
13
NPR. Kyle Rittenhouse Testimony at Kenosha Trial
14
CNN. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Judge Bruce Schroeder
15
OPB. Rittenhouse Lawyers Ask Judge to Declare Mistrial Over Video
16
NBC Chicago. Prosecutors’ Questions to Rittenhouse Anger Judge
17
NPR. A Look at Bruce Schroeder, the Judge in the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial
18
Harvard Law Review. Public Carry and Criminal Law After Bruen
19
CNN. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Verdict Watch
20
Politico. Kyle Rittenhouse Verdict and the Gun-Carry Divide
21
BBC. Kyle Rittenhouse: Supporters and Critics React
22
NBC News. Kyle Rittenhouse Wrongful Death Lawsuit Can Proceed, Federal Judge Rules
23
Fox 6 Now. Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Witness: Other Legal Matters Tied to Aug. 2020
24
ABC News. Friend Who Bought Rifle for Kyle Rittenhouse Reaches Plea Deal
25
WISN. Kyle Rittenhouse Gun Court Hearing in Kenosha