The federal civil lawsuit accusing Bassnectar (Lorin Ashton) of sex trafficking and sexually abusing underage fans ended in a confidential settlement on February 18, 2025, when the parties jointly asked the court to dismiss the case with prejudice just before it was set for trial. The financial terms were not disclosed, and no criminal charges have ever been filed against Ashton in connection with the allegations. The Bassnectar lawsuit settlement closed a nearly four-year case in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee without any finding of liability.1Rolling Stone. Bassnectar Settles Sexual Abuse Lawsuit2Billboard. Bassnectar Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Settled
Who Sued and What They Alleged
The case, Ramsbottom v. Ashton, No. 3:21-cv-00272, was filed on April 5, 2021, before Judge Aleta A. Trauger. The named plaintiffs were Rachel Ramsbottom, Alexis Bowling, and Jenna Houston. A fourth plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe #1, voluntarily dismissed her claims after the court refused to let her proceed under a pseudonym.3GovInfo. Ramsbottom v. Ashton, Case No. 3:21-cv-00272
The complaint alleged that Ashton “groomed, trafficked, and sexually abused” the plaintiffs while they were underage.1Rolling Stone. Bassnectar Settles Sexual Abuse Lawsuit According to the filing, Ashton contacted the women through social media while they were still in high school, invited them to hotel rooms after his shows, and provided cash and other items of value in exchange for sex. The suit further alleged that he manufactured and possessed child pornography, and that during a summer 2020 conversation with Ramsbottom he acknowledged he had “engaged with multiple women who were ‘too young'” and recognized an imbalance of power created by his age and celebrity.4The Guardian. Bassnectar EDM DJ Denies Allegations of Sexual Abuse and Human Trafficking
The Legal Claims in the Complaint
The amended complaint, filed May 7, 2021, asserted four counts:
- Count I: sex trafficking in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1591, against Ashton alone.
- Count II: benefiting from a sex trafficking venture under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591 and 1595, against Ashton and all corporate defendants.
- Count III: receipt and possession of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252 and 2252A, against Ashton alone.
- Count IV: negligence per se under Tennessee law, brought by Ramsbottom against Ashton and two of his corporate entities.
The corporate and individual co-defendants named alongside Ashton included Amorphous Music, Inc., Bassnectar Touring, Inc., Red Light Management, Inc., C3 Presents, L.L.C., and Carlos Donohue, identified as Ashton’s manager or tour manager and the founder of Gnarlos Industries.3GovInfo. Ramsbottom v. Ashton, Case No. 3:21-cv-00272
What the Court Ruled Before Settlement
Motions to dismiss came from most of the defendants between mid-2021 and early 2022. In January 2022, Judge Trauger granted most of them. She dismissed the claims against Red Light Management and C3 Presents, finding that the allegations against the corporate defendants were “very general” and relied on “legal conclusions” rather than the specific factual content required to show those companies knowingly participated in a sex trafficking venture, as opposed to simply doing business with Ashton. Claims against Donohue’s Gnarlos Industries were voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs.3GovInfo. Ramsbottom v. Ashton, Case No. 3:21-cv-00272
Ashton’s own motion for partial dismissal was largely denied. The core sex trafficking and child pornography claims against him survived and the case moved toward trial. The court did narrow some issues: it dismissed the “force, fraud, or coercion” theory and the allegation that Ashton benefited from participation in a trafficking venture, while allowing the claim that his cash payments constituted remuneration for sex to proceed. The court also ruled that Ramsbottom could not pursue trafficking claims for conduct that occurred after she turned eighteen.5Rolling Stone. Bassnectar Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Going to Trial
Ashton’s Defense
Ashton has denied all allegations of wrongdoing. In a motion to dismiss, his attorneys argued that the plaintiffs had “lied about their ages to ‘deceive’ him into believing they were at least 18 years old.”1Rolling Stone. Bassnectar Settles Sexual Abuse Lawsuit In his initial June 2020 statement to fans, before any lawsuit was filed, he said he had “never been involved in anything that was not absolutely, unequivocally consensual.” Days later he announced an indefinite hiatus, writing that he was “stepping back from my career” and “stepping down from my position of power and privilege in this community.”6Conscious Electronic. Bassnectar Announces Hiatus Over Sexual Misconduct Allegations
The Settlement
With a trial date approaching, the parties reached a confidential settlement on February 18, 2025. The court dismissed the case with prejudice, which permanently bars the plaintiffs from refiling the same claims against Ashton. Financial terms were not disclosed. In a joint statement, both sides said they had “amicably decided to resolve this matter and move on in peace.”1Rolling Stone. Bassnectar Settles Sexual Abuse Lawsuit2Billboard. Bassnectar Sexual Abuse Lawsuit Settled
One point worth flagging for readers looking at the broader picture: the settlement resolved the civil case only. No criminal charges have been filed against Ashton in connection with the allegations, then or since.7Live for Live Music. Evidence Against Bassnectar Defamation Complaint
What Ashton Has Done Since
On July 24, 2025, roughly five months after the settlement, Ashton, Bassnectar Touring, Inc., and Amorphous Music filed a 32-page defamation lawsuit in Maricopa County, Arizona, against David Montana Billings, creator of the @evidenceagainstbassnectar Instagram account that had amplified allegations against him since 2020. The complaint also named more than twenty anonymous defendants.7Live for Live Music. Evidence Against Bassnectar Defamation Complaint
The suit alleged that Billings conducted a “multi-year social media smear campaign,” publishing “unproven and untrue allegations” that labeled Ashton a “pedophile,” “sexual predator,” and “rapist,” and that the account published his home address in 2020 and incited online harassment. Ashton’s team argued the activity caused him to be “deemed a toxic entity,” costing him his touring career. Billings reportedly deleted the account shortly after legal action was initiated, and the defamation case was active as of mid-2025.7Live for Live Music. Evidence Against Bassnectar Defamation Complaint8EDM Identity. Bassnectar Is Suing the EvidenceAgainstBassnectar Creator for Defamation
Ashton has also been rebuilding the Bassnectar project. He launched a subscriber-only platform called “The Other Side” in early 2023 and released the album The Golden Rule that August. In November 2025 he signed with Paula Moore’s Greater Music Group, which announced plans for “live shows and touring, new music, collabs, and sync efforts.” A live performance was scheduled at the Park Avenue Music Center in San Jose for July 25, 2026.9Digital Music News. Bassnectar Plotting Serious Comeback10Apple Music. Bassnectar Artist Page