Meraki Solar Lawsuit: Liquidation, AG Probe, and Warranty Gap

The Meraki Solar lawsuit landscape now centers on an August 19, 2025 liquidation filing in Escambia County, Florida, which put the Pensacola-based residential solar seller into a court-supervised wind-down under Chapter 727 of Florida law.¹ If you bought a system from Meraki, you have a limited window to preserve any claim against what’s left of the company, and separate proceedings involving the installer, the acquiring company, and at least one major lender all affect what you can recover and from whom.

What Happened to Meraki Solar

Meraki sold solar systems but did not install them. Installations were performed by Titan Solar Power, which also held the workmanship warranties on Meraki-sold systems. On June 20, 2024, Titan filed for Chapter 7 liquidation in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona and ceased operations immediately, listing between 5,001 and 10,000 creditors.² Because Meraki was a partial owner of Titan and the two were financially entwined, the collapse left thousands of projects unfinished and the warranties in what one legal analysis called “a major grey area.”

In July 2024, Freedom Forever announced it had purchased Meraki’s assets and would act as the “official subcontractor” for Meraki’s existing customers, with Solar Pros taking over the sales side.³ Then-CEO Justin Wolf said he was “confident in trusting them with everything we have built” and transitioned to a VP of Sales role at Freedom Forever.⁴

Just over a year later, Meraki filed for liquidation. The Florida Division of Corporations listed Meraki Solar, LLC as inactive on September 26, 2025 after an administrative dissolution for failure to file its annual report.⁵

The August 2025 Liquidation and Your 120-Day Deadline

An Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors, or ABC, is Florida’s state-law alternative to federal bankruptcy. Meraki turned all of its assets over to a court-appointed assignee, who will sell them and pay creditors a proportional share of the proceeds after administrative costs. There is no reorganization; Meraki is not coming back.

The single most important date for a former customer: creditors must file a proof of claim within 120 days of the petition or lose the right to recover anything from the estate.¹ If you paid Meraki for work that was never completed, if you have a warranty claim, or if you paid for repairs the company never made, that claim needs to be documented and submitted to the assignee in Escambia County.

A few other features of the ABC process are worth knowing. Unlike federal bankruptcy, there is no automatic stay preventing you from filing a separate lawsuit, though you generally can’t seize assets already held by the assignee. The assignee’s power to unwind suspicious pre-filing transfers is narrower than a federal trustee’s.

Creditor attorneys have already asked the assignee to investigate the July 2024 transactions with Freedom Forever and Solar Pros to determine whether assets were moved out of Meraki before the filing. If the assignee declines, creditors plan to seek “derivative standing” to sue on the estate’s behalf under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act. No findings of fraudulent transfer have been made; the inquiry is at the motion stage.

The Freedom Forever Handoff and the Warranty Gap

The public announcements about the Freedom Forever acquisition did not specify whether existing customer warranties actually transferred. In practice, customers report that Freedom Forever has frequently told them it does not have them in its system or is no longer responsible for Meraki accounts.⁴ Because Titan Solar held the workmanship warranties and Titan is in Chapter 7, no one currently answers for the installation quality of a Meraki-sold system as a matter of contract.

If you’re trying to get service, keep written records of every attempt: the company you called, the date, the person you spoke with, and what they said. Those records support both a proof of claim in the ABC and any state consumer-protection complaint you decide to file.

What Customers Are Complaining About

The Better Business Bureau profile for Meraki Installers, LLC records 203 complaints over the past three years, 96 of them unanswered and only 12 resolved. Service or repair issues make up 131 of the 203.⁶⁷⁸

The most common patterns in those complaints:

Panels producing no power for months and monitoring apps that stop working, so homeowners can’t verify what the system is generating.⁷
Customers paying both a solar loan and a full electricity bill because the panels aren’t offsetting usage.⁶
Roof leaks and structural damage attributed to improper installation.⁶
Sales representations that solar loans were transferable at home sale, contradicted by lenders who required full payoff at closing.⁶
At least one customer reporting the panel manufacturer identified the installation as a fire hazard, and another alleging Meraki’s negligence voided the manufacturer warranty.⁸

Individual exposure runs high. BBB complaints reference installation costs up to $75,000 and financed amounts over $60,000, and one customer described a $60,000 cash contract for a project that was never completed.⁸

The New Mexico Attorney General Investigation

In August 2023, New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez announced that his office had opened an investigation into Meraki Solar based on what it described as a significant number of consumer complaints alleging unfair and deceptive practices, including aggressive sales tactics and withholding important information from customers.⁹ The announcement accompanied a separate lawsuit against a different company, New Mexico Solar Group; Meraki was named as a subject of the investigation but not as a defendant.¹⁰

Meraki said at the time it “looks forward to fully cooperating with the NM Attorney General’s office to address and resolve any concerns it may have.” Torrez said the complaints had “not yet resulted in a filing.” Whether the investigation has since produced formal charges or a settlement is not reflected in the record available here. If you’re a New Mexico customer, filing a complaint with the AG’s consumer protection division remains a separate avenue from the Florida ABC claim process.

If You Financed Through Mosaic

Many Meraki customers financed through third-party lenders, and one of the largest is now in its own bankruptcy. Mosaic Sustainable Finance Corporation and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas on June 6, 2025 (Case No. 25-90156).¹¹ Mosaic services more than $8 billion in residential solar loans and is running a court-supervised sale of substantially all its assets. Dozens of adversary proceedings have been filed against Solar Mosaic, LLC by individual borrowers.¹²

Whether loan terms, payment obligations, or defenses available under the FTC Holder Rule survive Mosaic’s restructuring will depend on how the bankruptcy court handles the loan-servicing portfolio and any sale. In the meantime, keep paying attention to who is billing you and under what name; a loan servicer change during bankruptcy is common.

A Note on Meraki Solar v. Rosenbalm

A federal case in the Northern District of Florida styled Meraki Solar LLC et al. v. Rosenbalm et al. (Case No. 3:21-cv-405-MCR-HTC) sometimes surfaces in searches about Meraki.¹³ That case is not a customer suit. Meraki was the plaintiff, suing three former associates over non-compete and confidentiality provisions in a District Manager Agreement.¹⁴ It does not affect consumer claims.

1
Florida Legislature. Florida Statutes Chapter 727 — Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors
2
ABC15 Arizona. Titan Solar Power Closes Down Operations, Files for Bankruptcy
3
Solar Builder Magazine. Freedom Forever Purchases Meraki Solar Assets, Eyes 40% Growth
4
Solar Power World. Freedom Forever Buys Meraki Solar Assets
5
Florida Division of Corporations. Meraki Solar, LLC — Sunbiz Detail
6
Better Business Bureau. Meraki Installers LLC — BBB Complaints
7
WFTV. Homeowner Claims Solar Panels Don’t Work
8
ConsumerAffairs. Meraki Solar Reviews
9
New Mexico Department of Justice. New Mexico Attorney General Takes Action Against Solar Companies to Protect Consumers
10
KRQE News 13. New Mexico Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Solar Group
11
Daily DAC. Mosaic Sustainable Finance Corporation — Chapter 11 Filing
12
Kroll. Mosaic Sustainable Finance Corporation — Case Information
13
GovInfo. Meraki Solar LLC et al v. Rosenbalm et al
14
CaseMine. Meraki Solar LLC v. Aaron Sandoval