Merchant Lynx Services Lawsuit: Class Actions and AG Settlement

The Merchant Lynx Services lawsuit most consumers are asking about is a 2023 proposed class action filed by an Alabama fur company, which accused the credit card processor of charging small businesses fees that were never agreed to and never disclosed. A second suit with nearly identical allegations followed in Florida in 2025. Both cases centered on the same practice: presenting merchants with a short, simple pricing agreement, then relying on a separate 35-page terms document to justify higher charges after the merchant signed.

The 2023 Maxine Furs Class Action

On February 14, 2023, Maxine Furs of Hoover, Inc., an Alabama company specializing in fur design, cleaning, and storage, filed a proposed class action against Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. — the legal name behind the Merchant Lynx Services brand — in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was numbered 4:23-cv-00641.¹

The complaint described a bait-and-switch. Sales agents would show merchants a three-page “Merchant Agreement” with straightforward flat-rate pricing. After the merchant signed, the company would raise fees or add new charges, bundling them with legitimate processing costs on billing statements so they were hard to spot. When merchants challenged the charges, the company pointed to a separate 35-page “MPA Terms and Conditions” document to justify them.²

The suit also alleged that Merchant Lynx withdrew the inflated amounts directly from merchants’ bank accounts before sending a billing statement, making the charges harder to catch and dispute.¹

The proposed class covered every U.S. merchant that paid fees to Merchant Lynx differing from the rates specified in the company’s Merchant Application and Agreement. The complaint called the fine-print provisions the company relied on “illusory” and “unconscionable.”²

The case was terminated on October 3, 2023, about eight months after it was filed. Court records do not show whether the class was ever certified, and no public ruling on the merits or formal settlement has been disclosed.³

The 2025 Catered Fit Corp. Suit

In January 2025, Catered Fit Corp. filed suit against Groundhog Enterprises in Broward County, Florida, making similar allegations. The complaint accused Merchant Lynx of charging undisclosed rates and fees, then concealing those charges by inflating permitted line items on billing statements. The claims included breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of Florida’s Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. Damages sought exceeded $50,000.⁴

Merchant Lynx removed the case to federal court in the Southern District of Florida, where it became 0:25-cv-60399, and quickly moved to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the action. An appeal followed, but the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. The appeals court dismissed the case in October 2025, and Judge Rodney Smith signed a final order of dismissal with prejudice on October 10, 2025.⁵

How the Contract Enables These Disputes

The contract structure both lawsuits attacked is documented in Merchant Lynx’s own published terms. The Merchant Processing Agreement sets a three-year initial term that automatically renews for successive three-year periods unless either party gives written notice at least 90 days before the term expires. The early termination fee is $495, or $500 in Maryland, and the agreement lets the company deduct that fee directly from the merchant’s payment settlements.⁶

A key provision states that the fees listed in “Schedule A” may be “amended by Servicers from time to time.” That language gives the company contractual authority to change rates after the merchant signs. The lawsuits alleged this clause is buried in the lengthy terms document merchants receive separately from the simplified agreement they actually sign at the point of sale.⁶

Equipment leases come with their own terms. They are explicitly non-cancelable for the full term. If a merchant defaults, the company can accelerate all remaining monthly payments and demand them immediately, plus the fair market value of the equipment.⁷

The 2014 Florida Attorney General Settlement

The company’s regulatory history predates the class action. In 2014, the Florida Attorney General’s Office investigated Merchant Lynx for potential violations of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act and for unlicensed telemarketing. The investigation ended with an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance, an agreement that avoids a formal finding of wrongdoing while requiring changes in practice.²

Under that agreement, Merchant Lynx committed to thirteen specific terms. Among them: providing customers with complete copies of its terms of service, honoring cancellation and refund requests, clearly disclosing all rates and fees, and refraining from debiting customer accounts without prior authorization.²

The 2023 Maxine Furs complaint alleged that many of the same practices the Florida AG targeted continued after the agreement was signed.

Complaints Outside the Courts

Beyond formal litigation, Merchant Lynx has drawn a steady stream of complaints. The company holds an F rating from the Better Business Bureau, with 50 complaints on file. The BBB revoked the company’s accreditation, citing in part its failure to respond to nine of those complaints.⁸

The complaints follow a recognizable pattern. Merchants say sales agents told them the service was month-to-month with no long-term commitment, only for them to later discover they had signed a three-year contract with automatic three-year renewals and a $495 early termination fee. Several merchants reported being unable to obtain copies of their signed agreements, and some alleged that signatures on contracts were forged or misrepresented by sales staff.⁹

Rate increases come up repeatedly. Merchants report transaction fees jumping significantly after sign-up, along with charges they say they never agreed to: annual fees of $199 or $420 for PCI compliance, monthly maintenance fees, and various statement or membership charges. Some merchants say the company continued withdrawing money from their bank accounts long after they canceled the service and returned equipment.⁹

Some accounts describe more aggressive collection tactics. Merchants who changed their bank account information to stop the withdrawals said Merchant Lynx circumvented the blocks, in some cases by altering the name on the transaction.⁹

Who Merchant Lynx Services Is

Merchant Lynx Services is the trade name of Groundhog Enterprises, Inc., a Georgia corporation headquartered at 348 Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. The company was founded in 2006 and is led by CEO John Kucyk. It operates as an Independent Sales Organization, acting as a middleman between small businesses and the banks and networks that actually process credit card transactions. Its acquiring bank partner is Esquire Bank, National Association, and it has historically worked with processors including TSYS, Fiserv, and iPayment.²

Merchant Lynx uses a network of independent contractors rather than employees to sell its services, a structure that has fed complaints about sales agents making promises the company later declines to honor.²

One boundary worth noting: neither the Maxine Furs class action nor the Catered Fit suit resulted in a public merits ruling or announced settlement fund. If you are a Merchant Lynx customer looking to recover overcharges, there is no open class action distribution to join based on the public record described here. Individual claims, arbitration under the MPA, or a state deceptive-practices complaint are the routes the reported cases actually followed.

1
ClassAction.org. Class Action Says Merchant Lynx Services Takes Unauthorized, Excessive Card Processing Fees From Small Businesses
2
ClassAction.org. Maxine Furs of Hoover v. Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. – Complaint
3
CourtListener. Maxine Furs of Hoover, Inc. v. Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. – Parties
4
Trellis.law. Catered Fit Corp. v. Groundhog Enterprises – Complaint
5
PACER Monitor. Catered Fit Corp. v. Groundhog Enterprises, Inc.
6
Merchant Lynx Services. MPA Terms and Conditions
7
Merchant Lynx Services. Equipment Lease Agreement
8
BBB. Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. Business Profile
9
PaymentPop. Merchant Lynx Reviews