The Motley Rice tobacco settlement refers to the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement, a $246 billion deal in which the firm’s founding partners, Ron Motley and Joe Rice, represented 26 state attorneys general against the four largest cigarette manufacturers.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement Signed on November 23, 1998, by 46 states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories, it remains the largest civil settlement in United States history. Motley ran the courtroom side of the case. Rice negotiated the terms.
How Motley and Rice Split the Work
Ron Motley was a Charleston, South Carolina, plaintiffs’ lawyer already known for suing the asbestos industry into bankruptcy.2PBS Frontline. Ron Motley Interview Mississippi attorney Richard “Dickie” Scruggs recruited him onto the trial team after Mississippi Attorney General Mike Moore filed the first state Medicaid suit against tobacco manufacturers in 1994.3PBS Frontline. Mike Moore The novel legal theory: instead of suing on behalf of individual smokers, who kept losing because juries blamed them for their own choices, states sued as third-party payers to recover Medicaid money spent treating smoking-related illness.4PMC (National Institutes of Health). Tobacco Industry Settlement
Motley described the division of labor in his own terms: “Dickie and my partner, Joe Rice are both very good negotiators… my job is to try the law suit. Prepare it for trial. And their job is to try to find a way, a solution to the litigation problems.” He put it more bluntly with a war analogy. “They are Eisenhower and I am Patton.”2PBS Frontline. Ron Motley Interview
Motley’s team pulled together hundreds of thousands of internal industry documents, found whistleblowers, and deposed executives and scientists. The strategy was to prove the industry ran as a racketeering enterprise that knowingly sold addictive, deadly products while suppressing the science. The team also hired political consultant Dick Morris to run polling and focus groups. Morris’s work identified the industry’s marketing to children as its most damaging public vulnerability.2PBS Frontline. Ron Motley Interview
The pivotal witness was Dr. Jeffrey Wigand, the former Vice President of Research and Development at Brown & Williamson, and the highest-ranking tobacco executive ever to publicly describe the industry’s manipulation of nicotine.5National Whistleblower Center. Jeffrey Wigand Wigand handed the FDA thousands of pages of evidence characterizing cigarettes as drug delivery devices, and paid for it. Brown & Williamson sued him for breach of a confidentiality agreement; he lost his $300,000 salary and was teaching high school by the time the litigation reached its peak.6PBS Frontline. Jeffrey Wigand Timeline Rice later credited Wigand’s cooperation paired with Motley’s litigation skills with changing “the public health and tobacco industry landscape.”7Motley Rice. Tobacco Master Settlement
For Motley, the case was personal. His mother had died of emphysema, which he attributed to her nicotine addiction.2PBS Frontline. Ron Motley Interview
From the Failed Global Settlement to the 1998 MSA
By 1997, 39 states had sued the industry.4PMC (National Institutes of Health). Tobacco Industry Settlement8PMC (National Institutes of Health). The Global Settlement and the MSA9California Legislative Analyst’s Office. Tobacco Settlement The immunity required federal legislation, and the bill died in Congress.
The parties went back to direct negotiations. On November 23, 1998, 46 state attorneys general, the District of Columbia, and five territories signed the Master Settlement Agreement with Philip Morris, R.J. Reynolds, Brown & Williamson, and Lorillard.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement Four states — Mississippi, Florida, Minnesota, and Texas — had already cut their own deals and were not signatories.10NAAG. The Master Settlement Agreement Because the MSA required no congressional action, it also could not grant FDA jurisdiction or cap the industry’s future liability the way the failed proposal would have.11Public Health Law Center. MSA Overview
What States Got and What the Industry Gave Up
The estimated value is $246 billion, paid annually to settling states in perpetuity as long as cigarettes are sold in the United States.10NAAG. The Master Settlement Agreement Initial payments from December 1998 through January 2003 ranged from $2.4 billion to $2.7 billion a year.12Office of the New York City Comptroller. Up in Smoke: The Declining Health of NYC’s Tobacco Settlement Bonds Payments adjust yearly for inflation and cigarette shipment volume. More than 45 tobacco companies eventually signed on as participating manufacturers.
The MSA also imposed permanent marketing restrictions:
- Youth-targeted advertising was prohibited, including cartoon characters such as Joe Camel.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement
- Billboards and public transit ads were eliminated.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement
- Paid product placement in movies, TV, and video games was banned, along with brand-name sponsorship of events with significant youth audiences.10NAAG. The Master Settlement Agreement
- Branded merchandise and free samples were prohibited.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement
- The industry had to release 14 million internal documents into a public archive and dissolve three industry-funded research groups that had been used to attack science on smoking’s health effects.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement
The settlement also created and funded what became Truth Initiative, whose “truth” countermarketing campaign is credited with keeping 2.5 million young people from becoming smokers between 2015 and 2018 alone.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement In return, participating manufacturers were exempted from future tort claims by state governments.13EBSCO Research Starters. Tobacco Industry Settlement The MSA did not resolve claims by individual smokers, who retained the right to sue on their own.
Where the Money Went
Youth smoking rates fell from 23% in 2000 to a historic low of 2% in 2022, driven partly by the “truth” campaign and partly by the price increases tobacco companies passed to consumers to cover their settlement costs.1Truth Initiative. Master Settlement Agreement With a cigarette price elasticity of roughly negative 0.4, those higher prices meaningfully cut consumption, especially among teenagers.14New England Journal of Medicine. MSA and Public Health
But the MSA did not require states to spend the money on tobacco control, and most didn’t. Less than 5% of MSA funds went to tobacco control programs. In fiscal year 2003, 47% of payments were folded into general state budgets to cover deficits.14New England Journal of Medicine. MSA and Public Health By 2006, 15 states were spending nothing at all on tobacco control from their MSA money. By 2008, only Maine, Delaware, and Colorado funded prevention programs at even the minimum level the CDC recommended.4PMC (National Institutes of Health). Tobacco Industry Settlement
Several states then securitized their future MSA payments, selling them off through state-backed bonds for immediate cash. That trade gave those states a perverse interest in the continued profitability of the tobacco industry, since the bond payments depend on it.14New England Journal of Medicine. MSA and Public Health12Office of the New York City Comptroller. Up in Smoke: The Declining Health of NYC’s Tobacco Settlement Bonds15KFF. Tobacco Settlement Payments
The Attorneys’ Fees Controversy
The private lawyers who worked alongside the state attorneys general became extraordinarily wealthy. Their fees were negotiated separately from the $246 billion, paid directly by tobacco companies, and often awarded under contingency contracts issued without competitive bidding.16Center for Public Integrity. Tobacco Settlement Helps Everyone but Smokers
A Tobacco Fee Arbitration Panel awarded $10.7 billion across 15 states and Puerto Rico. Scruggs’ firm alone received $1.2 billion.16Center for Public Integrity. Tobacco Settlement Helps Everyone but Smokers In Florida, a judge calculated that the requested fee amounted to roughly $92,500 per hour, calling it “patently ridiculous” and saying the request “shocks the conscience of the Court.” Arbitrators ultimately awarded Florida’s private counsel even more, at $3.4 billion.17Cato Institute. Great Tobacco Robbery: Lawyers Grab Billions
Critics questioned who got the work. Five Texas law firms awarded $3.3 billion had been major contributors to the state Democratic Party and Attorney General Dan Morales, and a federal grand jury investigated the financial ties. In Kansas, Attorney General Carla Stovall selected her former law firm, which had no tobacco experience, as local counsel.16Center for Public Integrity. Tobacco Settlement Helps Everyone but Smokers17Cato Institute. Great Tobacco Robbery: Lawyers Grab Billions18Stanford GSB. Fiscal Failings of Governments’ Tobacco Settlement
Scruggs did not keep his windfall quietly. In 2008 he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to bribe a Mississippi state judge in an unrelated case and was permanently disbarred.19FindLaw. Scruggs Disciplinary Proceedings, No. 2008-BD-00451-SCT
Individual Smoker Cases After the MSA
The MSA closed the state books but left individual smoker suits open, and Motley Rice’s most significant follow-on tobacco work has involved the Florida “Engle progeny” litigation. In the underlying 1994 class action, Engle v. Liggett Group, a jury found that nicotine is addictive, cigarettes are defective and unreasonably dangerous, and the manufacturers had conspired to conceal the risks, then awarded $145 billion in punitive damages in 2000.20Public Health Law Center. Engle Progeny Fact Sheet
The Florida Supreme Court threw out the $145 billion award in 2006 and decertified the class, but preserved the liability findings for individual plaintiffs to use going forward.21Florida Bar Journal. Engle v. Liggett: Has Big Tobacco Finally Met Its Match More than 8,000 former class members filed individual suits within the one-year window the court set.20Public Health Law Center. Engle Progeny Fact Sheet
In February 2015, Motley Rice announced a $100 million aggregate settlement resolving roughly 400 Engle progeny cases pending in federal court in Jacksonville. R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris each contributed $42.5 million, and Lorillard added $15 million. Individual plaintiffs could share in the funds under a formula drawn from past trial outcomes, and participation was voluntary.22Claims Journal. Tobacco Companies Settle 400 Lawsuits for $100 Million The settlement did not touch thousands of Engle progeny cases still pending in Florida state courts, which continue to generate appellate activity.23FindLaw. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Rey, No. 3D23-1015
The Firm After Tobacco
Ron Motley died on August 22, 2013, in Charleston at age 68, from respiratory complications related to a long illness.24The New York Times. Ron Motley, Who Tackled Big Tobacco, Dies Joe Rice went on to co-lead the BP Deepwater Horizon settlement, the $15 billion Volkswagen emissions settlement, and the $26 billion national opioid settlement finalized in 2022 with Johnson & Johnson, AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal Health, and McKesson. The firm now employs more than 100 attorneys with offices in South Carolina, Connecticut, New York, and Rhode Island.25Chambers and Partners. Motley Rice LLC