The NewJeans lawsuit is a Korean entertainment contract dispute in which the five members of the K-pop group tried to terminate their exclusive contracts with ADOR, a HYBE subsidiary, in late 2024. On October 30, 2025, the Seoul Central District Court ruled the contracts remain valid through 2029, rejecting all ten of the members’ grounds for termination. Four members have since returned to ADOR, one has been expelled and sued for roughly $30 million, and several related cases are still moving through the Korean and U.S. courts.1Chosun Ilbo. NewJeans Court Ruling Contract Termination Rejected
What Triggered the Dispute
The conflict began as a corporate fight between HYBE and Min Hee-jin, who founded ADOR in 2021 and produced NewJeans. HYBE owns 80% of ADOR; Min held 18%.2Forbes. NewJeans Label Controversy: What to Know About Dispute Between Major K-Pop Company HYBE and Subsidiary ADOR In April 2024, HYBE audited ADOR, accused Min of plotting to take the subsidiary independent, filed a police report alleging breach of trust, and demanded her resignation.3Billboard. HYBE Reports NewJeans Label CEO to Police Min denied the takeover claim, saying the real dispute was her internal complaint that another HYBE group, ILLIT, had copied NewJeans’ styling.4Variety. K-Pop: HYBE Alleged Breakaway NewJeans ADOR A court initially blocked her removal in May, but she stepped down as CEO in August 2024 and was replaced by Kim Ju-young.5Billboard. HYBE ADOR CEO Min Hee-Jin NewJeans Feud Timeline
The members treated Min as central to their artistic direction. On September 11, 2024, they held a YouTube livestream demanding her reinstatement and describing a toxic work environment.5Billboard. HYBE ADOR CEO Min Hee-Jin NewJeans Feud Timeline
How the Members Tried to Leave
On November 13, 2024, the members sent ADOR a formal “Certification of Contents” warning that they would terminate their contracts if specific breaches were not addressed within 14 days.6Forbes. Why Is Danielle Leaving NewJeans: A Complete Timeline of ADOR Dispute Their grievances included:
- Min Hee-jin’s removal and the resulting production vacuum.
- Workplace harassment, including Hanni’s account of being told to be ignored by a manager of another HYBE group.
- Alleged hidden cameras in practice rooms and unauthorized access to members’ phones.
- ADOR’s alleged failure to act on the ILLIT plagiarism claims.
- Alleged discrimination by HYBE in favor of other groups.
On November 28, 2024, NewJeans declared their contracts terminated effective the next day, arguing they owed no penalty because ADOR had breached first.7Teen Vogue. NewJeans ADOR Contract Termination Timeline Explained ADOR sued at the Seoul Central District Court within days to confirm the contracts were still valid.8BBC News. NewJeans ADOR Contract Termination
What the Courts Decided
The members tried to keep working independently. In February 2025 they rebranded as “NJZ” and booked a performance at ComplexCon Hong Kong. ADOR sought an injunction, and on March 21, 2025, the Seoul Central District Court granted it, confirming ADOR as the group’s exclusive management agency and barring independent activities.9Musically. HYBE’s ADOR Wins Preliminary Injunction in Battle With NewJeans/NJZ The group announced a hiatus during the ComplexCon show. On April 16, 2025, the Seoul High Court upheld the injunction, finding the members had not sufficiently shown ADOR breached its obligations.10The Fader. NewJeans ADOR Injunction Appeal Denied
The main ruling came on October 30, 2025. The Seoul Central District Court sided with ADOR and rejected all ten of the members’ claimed grounds for termination.1Chosun Ilbo. NewJeans Court Ruling Contract Termination Rejected The court found that Min Hee-jin’s removal did not create a managerial vacuum, that guaranteeing her role as CEO was not a fundamental obligation of the contract, and that the members’ personal trust in her did not change that analysis.11Korea Herald. Seoul Court Rules ADOR Dismissal of Min Hee-Jin Did Not Violate NewJeans Contract It also dismissed the allegations concerning leaked trainee videos, bullying of Hanni, the ILLIT plagiarism claim, and discrimination by HYBE as insufficient grounds for termination.12Music Business Worldwide. NewJeans Loses Contract Dispute as Seoul Court Rules in Favor of HYBE’s ADOR
The court articulated a broader rule: entertainers whose success is built on an agency’s investment of time, money, and personnel cannot arbitrarily walk away mid-term, because doing so would produce unfair outcomes for agencies that bear the upfront risk.1Chosun Ilbo. NewJeans Court Ruling Contract Termination Rejected To enforce the ruling, the court approved a penalty of 1 billion won (roughly $700,000) per instance of any unauthorized entertainment activity by a member.11Korea Herald. Seoul Court Rules ADOR Dismissal of Min Hee-Jin Did Not Violate NewJeans Contract
Where Each Member Stands Now
Within two weeks of the ruling, the members reversed their vow to appeal. On November 12, 2025, ADOR announced that Haerin and Hyein would resume activities, saying they had chosen to respect the court’s decision.13Forbes. All NewJeans Members to Return to ADOR After High-Profile Lawsuit Later the same day, Minji, Hanni, and Danielle said through their lawyers that they would also return after careful discussion.14NBC News. K-Pop Band NewJeans Set to Resume With Record Label After Court Loss The split communication, with two members going through ADOR and three notifying separately through counsel, signaled a rift inside the group.15Korea Herald. NewJeans Members Announce Return to ADOR
As of mid-2026, Hanni, Haerin, and Hyein have returned and were spotted in Copenhagen in April 2026 doing preproduction on new music, though no comeback date has been set. Minji’s status is unresolved; ADOR has said discussions are moving in a positive direction but she has not formally resumed activities.16Korea Herald. ADOR Confirms NewJeans Preproduction Discussions Danielle has been expelled and is now the target of a separate lawsuit. Financial analysts have said full-scale NewJeans activity is unlikely before the second half of 2026.17KED Global. NewJeans Recovery Projections
The $30 Million Lawsuit Against Danielle
On December 29, 2025, ADOR terminated Danielle Marsh’s exclusive contract, saying it had been “determined that it would be difficult for her to continue” as an ADOR artist.18The Guardian. NewJeans Member Danielle Sued for Millions After Bitter Feud With K-Pop Record Label The label alleged she had committed “serious violations carried out independently,” including discussing a collaboration with a U.S. band and doing a brand photo shoot without ADOR’s involvement.19Maeil Kyungjae (MK). Danielle Marsh Contract Termination Details
The same day, ADOR filed a civil suit at the Seoul Central District Court seeking 43.1 billion won (about $30 million) in damages and contract break penalties from three defendants: Danielle, an unnamed family member, and Min Hee-jin. ADOR alleged they bore significant responsibility for the dispute and for the group’s delayed return.20Rolling Stone. NewJeans Label ADOR Sues Danielle, Min Hee-Jin The case sits in Civil Division 31.21KED Global. ADOR Files Lawsuit Against Danielle and Min Hee-Jin
Danielle’s lawyers say she explored outside activities on the understanding that her contract would be lawfully terminated, that the photo shoot was reported to ADOR in writing, and that no revenue actually resulted. They have characterized the suit as an effort to make her untouchable to other agencies.19Maeil Kyungjae (MK). Danielle Marsh Contract Termination Details ADOR has since revised its claim down to 33.1 billion won after a review by new counsel. A second hearing was held on June 11, 2026, with another set for July 2.22Maeil Kyungjae (MK). ADOR Danielle Lawsuit Hearing Update
Min Hee-jin’s Put Option Win and Settlement Offer
Min pursued a parallel case to exercise a “put option” allowing her to sell her 18% ADOR stake back to HYBE. HYBE argued the option was invalid because the shareholders’ agreement had ended. On February 12, 2026, the Seoul Central District Court ruled for Min and ordered HYBE to pay about 25.6 billion won ($17.9 million). The court found that although Min had explored plans for ADOR’s independence, those plans “assumed HYBE’s consent” and did not amount to a serious breach, and it called HYBE’s “management rights usurpation” framing an “illusion.”23Chosun Ilbo. Min Hee-Jin Put Option Court Ruling
HYBE appealed and secured a stay on the payout.24UPI. ADOR NewJeans Min Hee-Jin HYBE Lawsuit Waive Payout Offer On February 25, 2026, Min publicly offered to give up the entire payout if HYBE dropped every civil and criminal action against NewJeans members, their families, external partners, former ADOR employees, and fans. “I’m here because there are values I desperately want more than a large sum of money,” she said, adding that her goal was to stop NewJeans from being “torn apart.”25Forbes. Min Hee-Jin Offers to Forgo $17.9M if HYBE Drops NewJeans Lawsuits HYBE has not publicly responded, and no settlement has been announced.26Music Business Worldwide. Min Hee-Jin Offers to Forgo $18M Payout if HYBE Drops All Lawsuits
Min has also set up a new agency, Ooak Records, registered in October 2025. As of early 2026 it had no signed artists, and Min has said she has no plans to build a NewJeans rival, suggesting a boy group would be a more natural next project.27Korea Herald. Min Hee-Jin Establishes New Agency Ooak Records
Criminal Complaints and the “How Sweet” Copyright Case
The criminal side of the dispute has largely collapsed. In July 2025, police dismissed HYBE’s breach-of-trust complaint against Min without referring it to prosecutors, citing “no evidence of wrongdoing,” and they also dismissed Min’s counter-complaints against HYBE executives.28Korea Herald. Police Dismiss Criminal Complaints Between HYBE and Min Hee-Jin On May 27, 2026, the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office formally dismissed the remaining charges Min had filed against HYBE and BELIFT LAB executives, finding insufficient evidence that HYBE’s public statements were false and concluding that access to ADOR’s internal communications was conducted under legitimate audit authority.29Aju Press. Prosecutors Dismiss Min Hee-Jin Charges Against HYBE Executives Civil defamation suits by Source Music (500 million won) and BELIFT LAB (2 billion won) against Min are still active.
A separate case is unfolding in the United States. On May 7, 2026, songwriters Audrey Armacost, Aidan Rodriguez, Adam Gokcebay, and Michael Campanelli filed a copyright infringement suit (case 2:26-cv-04931) alleging that NewJeans’ 2024 single “How Sweet” copied elements of their demo “One of a Kind.” The complaint names the NewJeans members, ADOR, and HYBE as defendants.30Digital Music News. HYBE NewJeans Copyright Infringement Lawsuit How Sweet The songwriters say they submitted their demo to ADOR in January 2024 during song selection, and they allege the first verse of “How Sweet” shares a 31-note melodic sequence over roughly eight measures, the same 4/4 time signature, and the key of B-flat minor with their track.31Billboard. NewJeans Members HYBE Copyright Lawsuit How Sweet ADOR has denied the allegations, saying it consulted with BANA, the production entity that oversaw the song, and was told “no form of copying or infringement took place.” The label and the members have said they will contest the case.32Korea Herald. NewJeans How Sweet Copyright Lawsuit