Trying to overthrow the United States government is prosecuted under four federal statutes, and the penalties for attempting to overthrow the government range from several years in prison to the death penalty, along with heavy fines, permanent disqualification from federal office, and asset forfeiture. Which statute applies depends on what the person actually did: conspired with others, took up arms personally, advocated violent revolution, or, in the narrowest and most serious case, waged war against the country or aided its enemies.
Treason
Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution itself. Article III, Section 3 limits it to two acts: waging war against the United States, or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.1Congress.gov. U.S. Constitution – Article III The framers wrote the definition narrowly on purpose, having lived under English treason laws broad enough to punish political dissent.
The evidentiary bar is the toughest in American criminal law. A conviction requires either two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court.1Congress.gov. U.S. Constitution – Article III Circumstantial evidence alone will not do it, which is why treason charges are extraordinarily rare and prosecutors almost always reach for other statutes.
If the government does win a treason conviction, the penalties are severe. A defendant faces at least five years in prison with no statutory maximum, a fine of at least $10,000, and the possibility of a death sentence. Conviction also permanently bars the person from holding any federal office.2Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2381 – Treason
Seditious Conspiracy
Seditious conspiracy, under 18 U.S.C. § 2384, reaches further than treason because it targets the agreement, not just the act. Two or more people who conspire to overthrow the government by force, oppose federal authority by force, or forcibly seize government property can be charged whether or not they succeeded, and whether or not they came close.3Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy
The statute is in active use. Federal prosecutors won seditious conspiracy convictions against leaders of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys following the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, with Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes sentenced to 18 years. The maximum penalty is 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.3Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy4Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 3571 – Sentence of Fine
Rebellion or Insurrection
A separate statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2383, reaches individuals who participate in, encourage, or provide support for an armed uprising against federal authority. Where seditious conspiracy requires an agreement among co-conspirators, this one applies to a person acting alone who directly joins or aids a revolt.5Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection
The maximum prison term is 10 years, with a fine of up to $250,000.5Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection4Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 3571 – Sentence of Fine The statute also makes anyone convicted permanently incapable of holding any federal office, a bar written directly into the criminal code and separate from the Fourteenth Amendment disqualification.
The Smith Act: Advocating Violent Overthrow
The Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385, criminalizes speech itself in narrow circumstances. It targets anyone who teaches, advocates, or encourages the violent overthrow of any government in the United States, as well as people who organize or join groups devoted to that purpose.6Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2385 – Advocating Overthrow of Government
The Supreme Court narrowed the statute in 1957, holding that the government may only punish advocacy of concrete action toward violent overthrow, not the teaching of revolution as an abstract idea. A professor lecturing on revolutionary theory is protected; a group leader instructing followers on when and how to attack federal buildings is not.
A conviction carries up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000, plus a five-year bar on federal employment.6Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2385 – Advocating Overthrow of Government4Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 3571 – Sentence of Fine
Penalties at a Glance
Federal law caps fines for individual felony convictions at $250,000 unless a specific statute sets a different amount.4Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 3571 – Sentence of Fine
- Treason (18 U.S.C. § 2381): death, or a minimum of five years in prison with no statutory maximum; minimum $10,000 fine; permanent bar from federal office.2Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2381 – Treason
- Seditious conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 2384): up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.3Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy
- Rebellion or insurrection (18 U.S.C. § 2383): up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000; permanent bar from federal office.5Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2383 – Rebellion or Insurrection
- Advocating overthrow under the Smith Act (18 U.S.C. § 2385): up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000; five-year ban on federal employment.6Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2385 – Advocating Overthrow of Government
The government may also seek forfeiture of assets used in the offense, including property, vehicles, or funds directed toward the effort. Where a sentence lands within these ranges depends on the defendant’s role, the scope of the conspiracy, whether anyone was injured, and the defendant’s criminal history.
What Prosecutors Have to Prove
Charges in this area rise or fall on specific intent. The government must show that the defendant genuinely intended to bring about the overthrow or other illegal objective, not merely that they said inflammatory things. Angry rhetoric at a rally, standing alone, is not enough.
For conspiracy charges, prosecutors have to establish that at least two people reached an agreement to pursue the illegal goal. That agreement need not be written down or spoken in explicit terms. It can be inferred from coordinated conduct: stockpiling weapons, scouting government buildings, assigning roles, or setting up encrypted channels for operational planning.
Force is non-negotiable. Every statute in this area requires force, violence, or the threat of it. Peaceful protest, civil disobedience, and organized resistance through legal channels do not trigger these laws no matter how radical the underlying political views.
Prosecutors also typically need overt acts, physical steps that move a plan past discussion. Buying tactical gear, surveilling targets, building or moving weapons, and coordinating logistics are the kind of evidence that separates a prosecutable case from constitutionally protected speech.
That constitutional line was drawn by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969. Speech advocating illegal action can only be punished when it is directed at producing imminent lawless action and is likely to actually produce it.7Library of Congress. Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 Both prongs must be met. A speech calling for revolution “someday” fails the imminence requirement; a speaker urging a positioned, motivated crowd to storm a building right now satisfies both.
Disqualification From Public Office
Prison and fines are not the only consequences. Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment bars anyone who previously swore an oath to support the Constitution and then engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding any federal or state office.8Constitution Annotated. Fourteenth Amendment Section 3 The provision was written after the Civil War to keep former Confederate officials out of government, but its language is not limited to that era.
This disqualification is not a criminal penalty and does not require a conviction. It functions as a constitutional eligibility rule. In Trump v. Anderson (2024), the Supreme Court held that only Congress, not individual states, can enforce Section 3 against candidates for federal office.9Justia Supreme Court. Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. ___ (2024) States may still enforce the provision against candidates for state office, but barring someone from the presidency or Congress requires congressional action.
Lifting the disqualification once it applies takes a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate.8Constitution Annotated. Fourteenth Amendment Section 3 That has happened only a handful of times, most notably through broad amnesty acts after the Civil War.
The Duty to Report Treason
Federal law also reaches people who know about treason and stay silent. Under 18 U.S.C. § 2382, anyone who owes allegiance to the United States and has direct knowledge that treason has been committed must report it as soon as possible to the President, a federal judge, or a state governor or judge. Deliberately concealing that knowledge is itself a federal crime known as misprision of treason.10Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2382 – Misprision of Treason
The statute requires actual, direct knowledge of a specific act of treason. Hearing rumors or suspecting that someone holds anti-government views does not trigger the obligation. But a person who witnesses or learns concrete details about an act of treason and intentionally stays silent faces up to seven years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.10Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 2382 – Misprision of Treason4Office of the Law Revision Counsel. 18 USC 3571 – Sentence of Fine Prosecutions are rare, but the duty is on the books and applies to every U.S. citizen.