California Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors Statute
Learn how the California assignment for the benefit of creditors statute works, from valid assignments and creditor claims to clawbacks and federal limits.
SEC v. Govil: Disgorgement, Pecuniary Harm, and Circuit Split
Learn how SEC v. Govil disgorgement law is evolving, from the pecuniary harm requirement and circuit split to the pending Supreme Court review.
Arizona v. California: Mainstream Apportionment and Reserved Rights
Learn how Arizona v. California divided the Colorado River's mainstream flow, from state apportionments to reserved tribal rights and federal oversight.
What Was the Outcome of the Brittany Norwood Case?
Learn how the Brittany Norwood case unfolded, from the Bethesda Lululemon killing and investigation through the trial, sentencing, and appeal.
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust: The Notice Standard
Learn how Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank set the notice standard for due process, from mail and publication rules to digital delivery and your remedies.
Madrid v. Gomez: Pelican Bay Force, SHU Conditions, and Remedy
Learn how Madrid v. Gomez shaped constitutional limits on prison conditions, from excessive force and medical care to solitary confinement and its legacy.
40 West 67th Street v. Pullman: Co-Op Business Judgment Rule
Learn how 40 West 67th Street v. Pullman shapes New York co-op evictions, from the underlying lease dispute to the deference courts give board decisions.
Scopes Trial Definition: The Law, Bryan vs. Darrow, and Legacy
Learn how the Scopes Trial played out in Tennessee, from the law and courtroom battle to the verdict, later constitutional rulings, and lasting legacy.
Terry v. Ohio: Stop and Frisk, Rights, and Evidence
Learn how Terry v. Ohio shapes stop and frisk law, from the reasonable suspicion standard to your rights during an encounter and what happens to evidence afterward.
Bourjaily v. United States: The Co-Conspirator Hearsay Rule
Learn how Bourjaily v. United States governs co-conspirator hearsay, from a judge's admissibility findings to later constitutional and rule developments.