Seth Lookhart is the former Anchorage dentist convicted in January 2020 on 46 criminal counts tied to a Medicaid fraud scheme, reckless sedation that nearly killed patients, and an extraction he performed while riding a hoverboard through his office. He was sentenced to 20 years to serve and permanently lost his dental license. In May 2025, the Alaska Court of Appeals ruled that the search warrant used to seize his cell phone was unconstitutional and sent the case back to the trial court to decide whether his convictions can stand without that evidence.
The Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Between May 2016 and March 2017, Lookhart ran his Anchorage practice, Clear Creek Dental, as a billing operation built around unnecessary intravenous sedation. Medicaid reimbursed IV sedation at far higher rates than local anesthesia, so he sedated patients who did not need it, billed for sedation services never performed, charged Medicaid more than he charged other insurers, and falsified dates of service.1State of Alaska Department of Law. Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Revocation of Lookhart Dental License His own texts, later recovered by investigators, described “leaving them on the meter” — keeping patients under for the full three-hour window Medicaid would pay for.2State of Alaska Office of Administrative Hearings. Lookhart Administrative Decision
The scheme overbilled Medicaid by more than $1.6 million.1State of Alaska Department of Law. Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Revocation of Lookhart Dental License Over the same period, Lookhart also diverted $412,500 in Medicaid payments owed to his business partner, Alaska Dental Arts LLC, into his own company, Lookhart Dental LLC.2State of Alaska Office of Administrative Hearings. Lookhart Administrative Decision Prosecutors sought more than $2 million in restitution.3Anchorage Daily News. Anchorage Dentist Sentenced to Prison
Dangerous Sedation and Patient Harm
The billing scheme required patients to be sedated, and Lookhart sedated them recklessly. He performed deep sedation roughly 80 percent of the time, though his permit authorized only light-to-moderate sedation. He sedated patients with serious underlying health conditions, ran multiple sedations at once, pressured patients who did not want sedation into accepting it, and routinely let sedated patients drive themselves home.4Justia. Seth Lookhart, DMD v. State of Alaska, Board of Dental Examiners
At least two patients came close to death. One showed vital signs the court described as “inconsistent with signs of life.” Another’s heart rate fell to 19 beats per minute. In both cases Lookhart did not call 911 and tried to resuscitate the patient himself. In February 2017, with no training to do so, he inserted an IV into a patient’s jugular vein, photographed the patient without consent, and texted the image to his wife with the caption “First time for me.”2State of Alaska Office of Administrative Hearings. Lookhart Administrative Decision
He also let his unlicensed office manager, Shauna Cranford, extract a patient’s tooth and prescribe controlled substances using his DEA number.2State of Alaska Office of Administrative Hearings. Lookhart Administrative Decision Patients testified at trial that he pulled the wrong teeth and departed from agreed treatment plans once they were under.5NBC News. Hoverboard-Riding Dentist Sentenced to 12 Years for Medicaid Fraud
The Hoverboard Extraction
In July 2016, Lookhart extracted a tooth from deeply sedated patient Veronica Wilhelm while riding a hoverboard through the office. He filmed the procedure and sent the video to friends and family. Wilhelm never consented to being filmed and did not know the video existed until investigators contacted her.6DrBicuspid. Court Affirms Decision to Pull License of Hoverboard Dentist In his texts, Lookhart joked that the stunt was a “new standard of care.” The video eventually went viral and helped trigger the wider investigation. At sentencing, Judge Michael Wolverton said the hoverboard incident, though the most publicized, was “not the most serious aspect of the case.”7CNN. Alaska Dentist Sentenced After Extracting Tooth While on Hoverboard
Conviction and 20-Year Sentence
Lookhart was arrested in April 2017, and his dental license and sedation permit were suspended at that time.2State of Alaska Office of Administrative Hearings. Lookhart Administrative Decision A six-week bench trial before Anchorage Superior Court Judge Michael Wolverton ended on January 17, 2020. Wolverton called the state’s evidence “simply overwhelming” and convicted Lookhart on all 46 counts.8HHS Office of Inspector General. Anchorage Dentist Seth Lookhart Convicted
The counts included:
- 11 counts of felony medical assistance fraud for the sedation billing, phantom charges, and falsified records.
- 3 counts of felony scheme to defraud covering both Medicaid and his business partner.
- 1 count of felony theft for the $412,500 taken from Alaska Dental Arts.
- 3 counts of misdemeanor reckless endangerment tied to the near-fatal sedations and the hoverboard extraction.
- 1 count of misdemeanor failure to meet minimal standards of dentistry.
- 27 additional misdemeanor counts across the broader pattern of misconduct.1State of Alaska Department of Law. Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Revocation of Lookhart Dental License
Lookhart Dental LLC, doing business as Clear Creek Dental, was separately convicted of 40 counts.8HHS Office of Inspector General. Anchorage Dentist Seth Lookhart Convicted
On September 14, 2020, Wolverton sentenced Lookhart to a composite 28 years with 8 suspended, or 20 years to serve, plus 10 years of probation with a ban on practicing dentistry during that period.9FindLaw. Lookhart v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-137527CNN. Alaska Dentist Sentenced After Extracting Tooth While on Hoverboard The trial court found 13 sentencing aggravators proven beyond a reasonable doubt.1State of Alaska Department of Law. Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Revocation of Lookhart Dental License Lookhart began serving on December 7, 2020.10CBS News. Alaska Hoverboard Dentist Sentenced to 12 Years for Fraud Wolverton told him at sentencing, “In reviewing all this over and over again, I have this visceral response — you darn near killed some people.”3Anchorage Daily News. Anchorage Dentist Sentenced to Prison
Loss of His Dental License
After the criminal conviction, Alaska’s Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing filed a 17-count administrative accusation seeking to revoke Lookhart’s license. In September 2020, an administrative law judge recommended permanent revocation as the “clear and obvious sanction,” and the Alaska Board of Dental Examiners adopted that recommendation.11FindLaw. Lookhart v. Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing, Board of Dental Examiners
Lookhart challenged the revocation, arguing the board had no precedent for a sanction that severe. On May 24, 2024, the Alaska Supreme Court affirmed the revocation. Justice Jude Pate wrote that “there is simply no prior case comparable to the scope of Lookhart’s egregious dishonesty and misconduct,” and held that the board’s statutory duty to seek consistency does not bar it from responding to unprecedented conduct.4Justia. Seth Lookhart, DMD v. State of Alaska, Board of Dental Examiners Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor called the case “the most widespread misconduct of any licensing matter in recent memory, if not ever, in Alaska.”1State of Alaska Department of Law. Alaska Supreme Court Affirms Revocation of Lookhart Dental License
The 2025 Appeals Ruling on the Cell Phone Warrant
Lookhart’s criminal appeal moved on a separate track from the licensing case, and on May 9, 2025 it produced a major ruling in his favor. The Alaska Court of Appeals found that the search warrant used to seize and search Lookhart’s and Cranford’s cell phones violated both the Alaska Constitution and the Fourth Amendment. The warrant application failed to establish probable cause connecting the suspected Medicaid fraud to the contents of the phones, and it was not sufficiently specific about what investigators were authorized to look for.9FindLaw. Lookhart v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-13752
The court called it an “unlawful general warrant” because it authorized an open-ended search of all phone contents, with no limits on timeframes, applications, or types of data. It also rejected the state’s argument that Cranford’s later consent to search her phone cured the problem, finding the consent tainted by the earlier unconstitutional search.9FindLaw. Lookhart v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-13752
That evidence was central to the trial. The photos, videos, and text messages recovered from the phones supplied much of the proof of Lookhart’s misconduct, including the hoverboard video and the “leaving them on the meter” texts. The appeals court reversed the trial court’s denial of Lookhart’s motion to suppress and sent the case back for two determinations: whether Lookhart has standing to challenge the search of Cranford’s phone, and whether his convictions can survive without the excluded cell phone data.9FindLaw. Lookhart v. State, Court of Appeals No. A-13752 That reassessment is still pending. The license revocation is final and unaffected by the criminal appeal.