Viral Election Settlements: Dominion, Fox News, and Smartmatic

Fox News paid Dominion Voting Systems $787.5 million in April 2023 to settle Dominion’s defamation lawsuit over false 2020 election claims, the largest publicly known media defamation settlement in U.S. history.1CNN. OAN and Smartmatic Reach Settlement2Reuters. Dominion’s Defamation Case Against Fox Poised for Trial After Delay3Fox News Press. Fox News and Dominion Voting Systems Reach Settlement

What Fox Agreed To

Dominion had sued for $1.6 billion in Delaware Superior Court on March 26, 2021, so the $787.5 million figure came in at roughly half its demand.4Justia. Dominion v. Fox News, N21C-03-257 EMD Fox’s public statement acknowledged “the Court’s rulings finding certain claims about Dominion to be false” and framed the resolution as a reflection of its “continued commitment to the highest journalistic standards.”3Fox News Press. Fox News and Dominion Voting Systems Reach Settlement No hosts were required to correct the record on air.

The headline number also overstates what Fox actually paid. The settlement is tax-deductible as a business expense, and tax professor Robert Willens estimated the net after-tax cost at about $590 million. Media liability insurance at a company of Fox’s size can cover somewhere between $100 million and $500 million, though the actual coverage was not disclosed. Fox said the payment would not affect operations, pointing to $4 billion in cash on hand.5WBAL-TV. Fox’s Settlement With Dominion Unlikely to Cost It $787.5M

Why Fox Settled When It Did

On March 31, 2023, less than three weeks before the settlement, Judge Eric M. Davis ruled on summary judgment that it was “crystal clear that none of the statements relating to Dominion about the 2020 election are true.” He rejected Fox’s “pure opinion” defense on the ground that opinions are not protected when they amount to accusations of criminal activity, and he allowed the case to proceed against parent Fox Corporation, finding a jury could reasonably infer that Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch either knew the claims were false or “recklessly disregarded the truth.”6Delaware Superior Court. Dominion v. Fox News, Summary Judgment Opinion The only question left for the jury was actual malice.

Discovery had already made that question dangerous for Fox. Dominion identified twenty defamatory statements broadcast across Fox programming, grouped around claims that Dominion machines were used to rig the election, that an algorithm manipulated vote counts, that the software traced back to technology built for Hugo Chávez, and that the company had corrupt political financial ties. Fox’s own fact-checking unit, the “Brain Room,” had concluded ten days after the election that claims about Dominion switching or deleting votes were “100% false.” Dominion said it sent Fox staff more than 3,600 emails trying to correct the record. The broadcasts continued.6Delaware Superior Court. Dominion v. Fox News, Summary Judgment Opinion

Internal messages showed hosts privately dismissing the same claims they were airing. Tucker Carlson texted Laura Ingraham in November 2020: “Sidney Powell is lying by the way. I caught her.”7Time. Fox Dominion Lawsuit Defamation Trial Sean Hannity testified he “did not believe it for one second” when Powell went on his show to allege the machines were rigged. Anchor Bret Baier texted Fox News President Jay Wallace that the fraud claims were baseless; Wallace replied, “We need to fact check this crap.”8NBC News. Dominion Releases Previously Redacted Slides in Fox News Lawsuit

Discovery also produced a business rationale. CEO Suzanne Scott criticized an on-air fact-check of Trump’s fraud claims in a December 2020 email: “This has to stop now. The audience is furious and we are just feeding them material. Bad for business.”8NBC News. Dominion Releases Previously Redacted Slides in Fox News Lawsuit7Time. Fox Dominion Lawsuit Defamation Trial

Where Dominion’s Other Cases Landed

Fox was the biggest defendant, not the only one. Dominion sued several people and outlets that pushed the same claims. Most have now resolved.

The Smartmatic Case Is Separate and Still Live

Smartmatic, a different voting technology company, filed its own $2.7 billion defamation suit against Fox in February 2021 in New York State Supreme Court. Named defendants include Fox Corporation, Fox News Network, the late Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro, Rudolph Giuliani, and Sidney Powell. Smartmatic alleges Fox broadcast false claims that its technology was used to rig the 2020 election for Joe Biden.16NPR. Fox News Smartmatic Lawsuit Election Claims Trial A New York appeals court has ruled that Smartmatic is not a “limited purpose public figure,” which could put it below the actual malice bar that Dominion had to clear.17First Amendment Watch. Legal Scholars Weigh In on the Lasting Significance of Dominion v. Fox

The case is tangled with an unrelated federal criminal matter. In August 2024, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida indicted Smartmatic’s parent company and several executives on charges of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and money laundering, alleging at least $1 million in bribes to a Philippine election official to secure contracts for the 2016 Philippine elections; a superseding indictment came in October 2025.18U.S. Department of Justice. Voting Machine Company Charged in Philippine Bribery and Money Laundering Scheme Fox has called the indictment “powerful rebuttal evidence” on reputation and damages; Smartmatic says the Philippines case has “no connection with the underlying charge of libel.”19Courthouse News. Fox Loses Bid to Pause Smartmatic Defamation Case in Wake of Charges Against Voting Machine Company

In December 2025, Justice David B. Cohen denied Fox’s motion to pause the defamation case pending the criminal trial.16NPR. Fox News Smartmatic Lawsuit Election Claims Trial In May 2026, the Appellate Division vacated the Note of Issue to permit further discovery into how the criminal indictment affects Smartmatic’s business, but affirmed the denial of a stay. The court noted that Smartmatic executives have repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during depositions in the defamation case.20New York Courts. Smartmatic USA Corp. v. Fox Corp. No trial date has been publicly set.

What the Settlement Did and Didn’t Change

Because the Dominion case ended before trial, it produced no jury verdict and no appellate opinion binding on future courts. Scholars have largely concluded the case will not reshape the “actual malice” standard from New York Times v. Sullivan. Media law scholar Sandra Baron said the litigation is unlikely to have “a significant impact on the law of ‘actual malice’ or how it is litigated.” Professor Samantha Barbas said it did show the standard is “difficult to meet but not impossible,” proving “libel law is not dead in America.”17First Amendment Watch. Legal Scholars Weigh In on the Lasting Significance of Dominion v. Fox

The bigger effect looks practical. Discovery turned Fox’s own texts and emails into the central evidence against it, and attorney Martin Garbus predicted networks would respond by adopting “internal rules so they will not print the kinds of notes and memos” that hurt Fox.17First Amendment Watch. Legal Scholars Weigh In on the Lasting Significance of Dominion v. Fox Whether that caution reaches editorial decisions or only document retention is a question the Smartmatic case and the two remaining Dominion suits may end up answering.