The Kaleidoscope Miracle Drops lawsuit was not about the product. It was a website accessibility case filed under the Americans with Disabilities Act, captioned Fagnani v. Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC, brought in the Southern District of New York on February 27, 2025, and dismissed with prejudice on October 8, 2025 after the parties settled.1PACER Monitor. Fagnani v. Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC et al
What the Complaint Alleged
Plaintiff Mykayla Fagnani sued Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC and Kaleidoscope Hair Products, L.L.C. “on behalf of herself and all other persons similarly situated.” The case was classified under Nature of Suit code 446, covering civil rights claims tied to the ADA.1PACER Monitor. Fagnani v. Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC et al
Suits of this kind typically allege that a company’s website is not equally accessible to blind or visually impaired users, pointing to technical failures such as missing alternative text on images, empty links, and poor keyboard navigation.2ADA Compliance. Gottlieb & Associates The complaint invoked Title III of the ADA along with the New York State Human Rights Law and the New York City Human Rights Law. Nothing in the filing concerned the safety, labeling, or effectiveness of Miracle Drops or any other Kaleidoscope product.
Who Filed It, and Why This Kind of Case Is Common
Fagnani is a frequent ADA plaintiff who filed 28 similar lawsuits in the first half of 2025. Her counsel, Gottlieb & Associates, is one of the most active filers of ADA website accessibility cases in the country, with more than 360 federal lawsuits filed in 2024 and more than 200 in the first half of 2025 across retail, fashion, food service, and beauty.1PACER Monitor. Fagnani v. Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC et al By one analysis, 92% of the text in the firm’s complaints is identical from case to case.
The economics push companies toward settlement. Filing fees run around $500 per case, while a defendant can spend $50,000 or more litigating a motion to dismiss. Settlement demands from the firm typically fall between $10,000 and $25,000. E-commerce sites with heavy product imagery, including those built on platforms like Shopify, are frequent targets because their pages readily generate automated accessibility flags. Kaleidoscope’s site, iluvcolors.com, fits that profile.
How the Case Ended
The docket moved quickly. On July 2, 2025, the parties notified the court of a settlement in principle. Five days later, Judge Katherine Polk Failla issued a conditional order of dismissal, giving the parties 60 days to finalize the deal or reopen. No motion to reopen was filed. On October 6, Fagnani filed a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice, and Judge Failla signed the order on October 8. The dismissal was without fees or costs to either side.1PACER Monitor. Fagnani v. Kaleidoscope Hair Products Global, LLC et al
Although the complaint was styled as a putative class action, no class was ever certified; the settlement was reached before any class could be defined. The financial terms are not disclosed in the public docket.
Context on the Company
Kaleidoscope Hair Products was founded in 2014 by Jesseca “Judy” Dupart, a former New Orleans hairstylist.3Forbes. The Superhero Entrepreneur: How Jesseca Harris Dupart Overcame Loss to Build a Multimillion-Dollar Business Its signature product, Miracle Drops, is a scalp treatment containing tea tree oil, peppermint, and aloe extracts marketed for hair growth and scalp health.4Target. Kaleidoscope Miracle Drops – Original 2 fl oz The company is headquartered in Temple, Georgia, and its products are sold through Target, Walmart, and Sally Beauty.5iluvcolors.com. Our Story If you arrived here looking for a Miracle Drops product recall or personal injury suit, the Fagnani case is not that; the public record shows an ADA website matter that has already been closed.